garden design Archives - Home Garden Companion

You may love gardening and think there is nothing wrong with it. That would have been me. Little did I think when picking up a book that appeared benignly similar to most books of its kind, that I would happen upon some thoughts that deeply expressed the way I view gardening. Now, after all these years.

The expression of this started out general enough:

“The single most essential element in any garden is not some particular object, plant, or tool. What’s vital is the gardener who loves it.”

It almost seemed like an inane thing to say …why, it was obvious wasn’t it? Until, like many profound things, the initially obvious became the core from which the whole had moved far from; and the dawning insight outlined the actual situation. Gardening has become displaced from the gardeners and their love of the wonderful world of plants.

When was the last time we understood that we the gardeners are the most essential part of our gardens? Doesn’t that seem like environmental heresy? Like some hearkening back to ancient and mistaken thinking? A pre-Galilean gardener-centric way of thinking?

Our problem:

“The garden has become a product, a home-improvement project, a look. … Gone… is the ongoing process and relationship gardeners seek and enjoy, as gardening becomes a goal-driven activity with the desired end product a garden once installed should be maintained with minimum of effort and involvement.”

We are so inculcated with these ideas that we might be wondering “Is that a bad thing?”

It is an imbalanced thing, which as gardeners we know can be a bad thing.

The book I have been reading is “Plant Driven Design” by Scott and Lauren Ogden. This post is not a book review which I hope to do soon, but some commentary on the ideas.

Ideas, which are almost “eureka” in character. A type of synthesis involving many ideas of how we approach nature and how we garden, along with many garden philosophies that we have absorbed in an almost osmotic way from books, magazines, and public examples.

Garden has fashion, but it is not fashion, and the idea that your garden could be trendy is just the sad example of how far away we have strayed from being in touch with the earth. I want to get back to the garden, literally, and in my writing about it, too.

That message, that the gardener and the relationship to the plants is so important, is buried within some of the ideas of the truly great gardeners, as well.

The iconic name that conjures up reverence is surely Gertrude Jekyll, and who seems to have molded the garden more to design than she? Yet, if you read one of her famous statements, and if you are familiar with her writings it is apparent how much the plants themselves, and the delight of intimacy with them and their cultivation took precedence for her. The quote cited by the Ogdens:

“The first purpose of a garden is to give happiness and repose of mind, which is more often enjoyed in the contemplation of the homely border … than in any of the great gardens where the flowers lose their identity and with it their hold on the human heart and have to take a lower rank as mere masses of colour filling so many square yards of space.”

We have taken her advice of planting in drifts to extrapolate into big blocks of “color” with a Mondrian-like impersonality of shape rather than the individual traits of the plants.

We, then, have lost touch with those aspects of nature that can humanize our existence and instead have mechanized everything into patterns and recipes and methods.

All good and well for beginning our concepts (like coloring book pictures help us to understand what something might elementally look like), but not the best for enjoying the beauty of the interplay between us, our plants, and our homes.

We are reducing the process too much, too completely, and losing sight of what makes a garden such a wonderful part of our lives: the interaction of us with nature, and with the plants themselves.

I have spent many hours of reading, implementing, and thinking of gardening in terms of design -the William Robinson to Piet Oudolf views, that I dropped the more intimate and satisfying aspects that are obvious in the writings of some of the garden essays of earlier times. Why do we love Louise Beebe Wilder or Celia Thaxter? It is the resonance we feel with their love of their own gardens, the plants and their growth, appearing like old friends during their expected seasons.

I do believe, if we knew to look for this fascination with plants and love for the making of the garden in every garden writer or guide, we would find it. I believe, further, that it is resident in some way in all of us. To find that part that answers to the beauty of the creation inside us is our profile as a gardener.

I now have found an expression of what I would call my own garden philosophy. A new favorite book, and as I read through it and absorb its lessons, I hope to give a future review so others may think about how this all fits with their own views and experience.

So, exactly what is wrong with gardening today?

It is seen as a set of projects instead of an occupation and pleasure.
Results in overuse of inappropriate plants and disappointed gardeners (especially “would-be” gardeners)
A loss of the unique in gardens and in the genius(spirit) of a place
A disconnect between people and nature
Boring sameness in uninspired neighborhoods, people’s loss of interest in making a garden.
Poorly grown, little understood plantings.

We think by presenting gardening as something easy, mindless, and trendy that we will interest more people in doing it. That isn’t what interests people. People want those qualities in something viewed a drudgery and obligation. Not something that they will willingly, even sacrificially, take time out for. They reserve those efforts for something they care about that create a sense of accomplishment and enjoyment.

What can we do differently:

Present gardening as a challenging, but rewarding activity ( which it is)
Be truthful about gardening: no instant gardening, no “easy,no work” gardening, or promises of one that will seemingly take care of itself.
Share the wealth of our plants and plant knowledge, encourage wise gardening methods for good results.
Have more fun in our gardens- laugh more, compete less. Generally this will make our lives better, why not our gardens?
Let the good of the gardener and the plants come first.

Every month has it’s supreme leading lady flower of the garden; June has the Rose, but July has the Lily. Especially now that the “Orienpets” have been created. They were the belle of several beds at the Inniswood Gardens Metro Park, and I would love to have some in my garden next year. “Orania” was the one I was most taken with because of her blonde and blush coloring, but there were others that were just as lovely.

You know, in gardening you sort of run out of superlatives when you see a stand of flowers that overflows with color, form and fragrance. I suppose you can just stand there without words, but that doesn’t work so well when trying to describe an impression of the senses to others. Not even the photos do justice to the way the eye is glutted with such delicious blooms, not to mention soft cotton candy scent- it is that sweet!

I’ve written about other lilies previously, and I really think you could build garden pictures around many of these perennial bulbs with their tall vertical lines, large flowers and delightfully harmonious colors- they manage to combine oranges, purples and pinks equally well. I think it is their subtleties that do it. Softened like ice cream sherberts and sorbets or sparkling with deep and intense hues, they hold your attention in the bright sunshine and colorfully clad neighbors vying with each other in the height of the bloom season.